AI Max is set up with a verified control plan, not with a single switch
Search terms, ad copy and landing pages need separate approvals even though they are optimized together
AI Max is an optimization layer for existing Search campaigns, not a separate campaign type. Google describes AI Max as a comprehensive suite comprising additional search term matching, text customization and final URL expansion. This does not mean every business should activate every feature at the same time and without its own boundaries. The starting point is the current Google Ads FAQ on AI Max for Search campaigns.
For an SME in Germany, setup therefore begins before anyone clicks a setting in the account. First define a reliable conversion goal, a sufficiently clear campaign role, suitable landing pages, permitted advertising claims and the intended reach boundary. Then give each feature its own approval: Which inputs may it use, which outcomes are excluded, which report will be used to review it and who decides whether to continue or stop?
This guide introduces the AI Max control plan for that purpose. It connects the campaign and ad group levels without confusing them, and separates activation, delivery, observation and business outcomes. The plan promises neither more conversions nor a particular CPA or ROAS. It ensures that a later change remains traceable, reviewable and selectively reversible when necessary.
Define which additional search terms and signals may fit the campaign's role.
Define which claims may be generated and which wording must remain protected.
Approve suitable URL families and exclude risky or unrelated pages.
Assess search terms, assets, landing pages, conversions and business value separately.
Separate the technical setup from the 2026 Google Ads overview and from Performance Max
This page explains the specific AI Max workflow, not the entire transformation of AI-powered search
The foundational guide Google Ads for small businesses in Germany places goals, campaign roles, budgets and measurement in their wider context. A separate annual overview can also explain how AI-powered search is changing. This page deliberately begins later in the process: an existing Search campaign has been selected as a possible test candidate, and the features, levels, controls, reporting paths and stop rules now need to be configured in concrete terms.
AI Max remains tied to the logic of Search campaigns. It does not automatically replace the cross-channel remit of a Google Ads Performance Max: when it makes sense and when it does not, and Performance Max is not a reason to stop reviewing search terms, ad messaging and landing pages individually in Search. Campaign types are separated by business objective, inventory, data and the level of control required, not by which product name sounds newer.
This guide does not cover a full account migration, Shopping and travel feeds, individual legal advice, a general introduction to Smart Bidding or a guaranteed performance benchmark. The interface may also change. The control plan therefore describes not only click paths but, above all, professional decisions that remain valid regardless of where a menu item appears.
AI Max features, levels, URL and brand controls, test design, reporting and approval.
The AI search landscape, full migrations, feed projects, privacy reviews and account forecasts.
Review the goal, budget, bidding strategy, website and ownership before activation
A feature being technically available does not make a campaign a suitable test candidate
Google points advertisers to conversion- or conversion-value-based Smart Bidding strategies for the full feature set. Search term matching does not work with Manual CPC; AI Max capabilities remain limited. In addition, budget-constrained campaigns are not a good starting point. Furthermore, target-based bidding systems were updated on 17 August 2026. Since the change, budget-constrained campaigns using target CPA or target ROAS have been aligned more consistently with their bidding target, including when budgets change. Before an AI Max test, the budget status and target must therefore make business sense; correcting the target or budget at the same time would unnecessarily confound the evaluation.
Treat the website as an input, not merely as a destination. Product and service pages must be accessible, current, in the appropriate language and unambiguous in meaning. Pages containing outdated offers, login areas, job vacancies, mandatory legal information or content in an unrelated language do not automatically belong in the permitted scope. Existing responsive search ads, keywords, negative keywords and brand controls must likewise reflect the actual campaign role.
The activation decision is not derived from a blanket minimum number of conversions. What matters is the reliability of the primary goal, sufficient diagnostic visibility, a meaningful control state and the ability to confirm lead or sales quality outside the advertising interface. If any of these elements is missing, the next step is Repair or Observe, not automatically Activate.
| Review area | Minimum evidence | Typical risk | Correction | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business goal | Primary conversion professionally confirmed | Optimization towards a micro-action | Correct the goal and value logic | Marketing and sales | Approve or repair |
| Budget and bidding | No unresolved budget constraint | The test measures a budget change | Stabilize target and budget beforehand | Paid Search | Stabilize |
| Campaign role | One clearly defined demand area | Overlapping responsibilities | Document the role and non-goals | Paid Search | Separate |
| Website | Suitable page families are live | Incorrect dynamic destinations | Maintain and exclude pages | Web and content | Review |
| Advertising claims | Permitted claims documented | Unapproved AI-generated copy | Text guidelines and sample review | Brand and subject expert | Approve |
Create the AI Max control plan as a binding configuration before editing the account
Give every feature a level, purpose, inputs, boundary, evidence path and decision
The AI Max control plan is not an archive of screenshots. It is a compact specification for one campaign and records, for each feature, its business purpose, technical level, permitted inputs, exclusions, review report, responsible person and stop rule. This allows a team to see whether a campaign-level setting applies to every ad group or whether one ad group is intentionally controlled differently.
A table in the project or documentation system is enough for the first version. What matters is the version logic: the baseline, planned change, approval date, account state actually visible and subsequent decision are stored separately. An entry saying only 'AI Max on' is too broad because search term matching, text customization, final URL expansion, URL inclusions, brands and locations have different effects and control surfaces.
The plan is also a handover document. Paid Search may operate the settings, but Content must approve pages and claims, Analytics validates measurement, and Sales or the CRM confirms quality. In a small business, one person may cover several roles. The review steps should still remain separate so that a technical success is not prematurely treated as a business success.
| Feature | Level | Permitted input | Boundary | Review report | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Search term matching | Campaign and ad group | Keywords, assets and suitable pages | Brand, search intent and negative keywords | Search terms and source | Keep, constrain or disable |
| Text customization | Campaign | Ads, domain, landing pages and keywords | Terms, claims, tone and mandatory wording | Asset details report | Approve or remove |
| Final URL expansion | Campaign | Suitable pages on the domain | URL exclusions and page boundaries | Landing pages and selection source | Open, constrain or disable |
| URL inclusions | Ad group | Approved URLs or rules | Thematic role of the ad group | Actual landing pages | Expand or correct |
| Brands and locations | Campaign or ad group | Approved lists and locations of interest | Brand strategy and region | Search terms, location and quality | Adopt or refine |
Freeze the conversion goal and baseline before expanding reach
AI Max must not conceal measurement errors while also being judged as their solution
Google distinguishes between primary and secondary conversion actions. An action influences bidding optimization only under the applicable goal rules; a secondary observation action is not automatically an equivalent business goal. The control plan therefore records not merely 'conversions' but the specific action, counting method, value logic, source, campaign assignment and professional confirmation.
The technical foundation—Google Ads tag, GA4, Consent Mode, imports and deduplication—is covered in greater depth in the guide to Google Ads conversion tracking with GA4 and Consent Mode. For AI Max, also save a baseline sample: relevant search terms, ads currently served, current landing pages, conversion lag, lead status and budget status. This sample documents the starting point, but does not by itself prove the cause of later changes.
During the test, do not quietly change the goal definition, attribution logic or CRM status. If a repair is unavoidable, document it as a separate event and limit or restart the evaluation accordingly. Higher platform volume accompanied by a different counting method is not reliable evidence of AI Max's contribution.
- Document the primary conversion, campaign goal and bidding strategy together.
- Treat secondary micro-actions as diagnostic signals, not substitutes for business value.
- Resolve duplicate imports, unclear counting methods and missing deduplication before the test.
- Include conversion lag and CRM feedback in the evaluation period.
- Use the baseline export and event log as documentation, not as proof of causation.
Control search term matching deliberately at campaign and ad group level
Additional reach comes from keywords, assets and pages, not from a new keyword list
The search term matching feature in AI Max supplements existing keywords with broad-match and keywordless technologies. Google uses existing keywords, ad content and URLs for this purpose. AI Max must be activated at campaign level; search term matching can then be turned on or off at ad group level. This makes it possible to test one clearly bounded ad group without opening every group in the same way.
The decision begins with the role of the ad group. A group for a precise service can allow additional phrasing if the offer, page and conversion goal remain the same. A brand- or compliance-sensitive group may require tighter boundaries. Negative keywords still have a role, but should not be created reflexively from every individual new search term; patterns, business relevance and demonstrated quality are what matter.
The control plan describes permitted intent families and clear non-goals. This is more robust than an endless wish list of individual search terms. The evaluation checks whether additional search terms fit the campaign role, the text that actually served and the actual landing page. Only then does the economic assessment follow, using confirmed conversions or values.
Which problems, services or products may the ad group additionally cover?
Which keywords, assets or pages probably supported the match?
Which brands, meanings, regions or informational searches remain excluded?
Which search terms lead to suitable pages and confirmed business outcomes?
Activate text customization only with current source material and reviewable advertising claims
Generated headlines and descriptions inherit both the quality and the errors of the available content
The official help page on text customization in Search campaigns describes it as a campaign setting within AI Max. Additional headlines and descriptions can be created from the context of the domain, landing page, existing ads, keywords and other assets, and combined with manually created RSA assets. The feature therefore replaces neither a strong starting ad nor a well-maintained website.
Before activation, review a sample of the source material: prices, availability, scope of service, geographic claims, deadlines, superlatives, guarantees and mandatory information. If the landing page and ad contradict each other, automation can scale the contradiction. Polished copy is not enough; it must also be factually accurate, consistent with the brand and understandable in relation to the landing page actually selected.
After activation, review Google-optimized assets in the details report. Remove a problematic asset and correct the underlying source or rule. Deleting only the individual asset is not enough if the same incorrect claim remains on several pages and may be used again as source material.
- Retain manually created RSA headlines and descriptions as a robust starting point.
- Review the website, ads and offer terms for contradictory claims.
- Explicitly approve prices, availability, regions, guarantees and mandatory information.
- Review Google-optimized assets against actual delivery and the landing page.
- Correct errors in the asset, rule and source page before approving the feature again.
Use text guidelines as a protective layer, not as a substitute for editorial review
Term exclusions and messaging restrictions must be specific, testable and current
Google presents text guidelines for AI Max Search campaigns as an experimental beta feature. Text customization must be enabled. Two kinds of controls are available: excluding exact terms or phrases, and restricting the possible advertising message. New guidelines can also affect existing Google-optimized assets; assets that do not comply may consequently be removed from delivery.
A good guideline is narrower than 'write professionally' and more robust than a complete piece of desired copy. Examples include prohibited discount language, unsupported market-leadership claims, impermissible exclusivity or a clear restriction on the service area. Mandatory wording that must appear in every single ad should not quietly be treated as guaranteed by a beta feature. That requires separate approval of the specific product capability and actual delivery.
The control plan stores the guideline, rationale, affected campaign, review method and latest review. Update guidelines when offers, legal requirements or the brand change. Because the feature is experimental, human sampling remains mandatory; a saved guideline proves neither correct application nor complete coverage.
If a price, guarantee, authorization, mandatory statement or sensitive claim must be controlled exactly in every delivery, approval must not rely solely on a generative text guideline. First confirm the feature scope, preview, reports and a professional sample review.
Treat final URL expansion as the selection of new landing pages, not as a minor copy option
Text customization, dynamic landing pages and pinned RSA assets affect one another
The final URL expansion feature in Search campaigns is a campaign setting in AI Max and is enabled by default when you opt in. Google may select a URL on the same domain that it considers more relevant, provided it matches the search and the theme of the ad group. Text customization must be active so that the ad copy can be aligned with the dynamically selected page.
This connection changes the approval process. When another URL is selected, pinned responsive search ad assets may not be respected because they may not match the new user intent. The same can apply when URL inclusions are used. Businesses that always require certain pinned statements must therefore determine whether final URL expansion and URL inclusions are compatible with that requirement at all.
Before the test, review the domain as an inventory of pages requiring approval. Confirm page families with a suitable offer, language, availability and conversion path; exclude login pages, careers, legal notice, privacy information, outdated promotions, empty categories and unrelated blog posts. A single starting URL does not prove that every destination eligible for automatic selection is suitable.
The page answers the specific search intent and fits the role of the ad group.
The offer, language, claims, contact path and legal presentation have been reviewed.
Tracking, redirects, parameters and the conversion path work on the actual URL.
Review URL inclusions, exclusions, page feeds and tracking templates as one connected system
An inclusion is a hard boundary only when the other URL features are configured accordingly
URL exclusions operate at campaign level and require AI Max, text customization and final URL expansion to be enabled; URL inclusions operate at ad group level. When AI Max is disabled, existing URL inclusions and exclusions are ignored for ad serving. If URL inclusions are active and final URL expansion is disabled, the selected URLs and advertiser-provided RSA destinations define the dynamic page scope. If expansion remains active, Google may additionally use other URLs it considers relevant. The control plan therefore records the combination and intended reach, not merely the existence of a list.
Test rules with positive and negative examples. A pattern for a service category must include genuine subpages without accidentally opening translated pages, outdated parameter URLs or editorial content. Do not create exclusions from path names alone; verify them against the actual page inventory. Repeat the sample review after a relaunch or URL change.
Tracking templates deserve a separate technical review. Dynamic landing pages must work with {lpurl}, parameters, redirects and external tracking systems; static or unusually nested templates can cause incorrect destinations or 404 errors. Before activation, open several permitted landing pages with their complete parameters and test the conversion chain.
- Compile URL families from the sitemap, navigation and actual page inventory.
- Document inclusions with final URL expansion on and off as different configurations.
- Exclude careers, login pages, legal content, empty categories, outdated offers and incorrect languages.
- Test {lpurl}, tracking parameters, redirects, 404 status and the consent path on several pages.
- Approve the URL rules again after a relaunch, translation or offer change.
Set brand inclusions, brand exclusions and locations of interest at the correct level
Control means a clear relationship to the campaign role, not the largest possible number of lists
The official help page on applying brand inclusions to Search campaigns documents their use at campaign and ad group level, as well as an ad-group inclusion overriding the campaign-level inclusion. In contrast, brand exclusions operate at campaign level in AI Max. This inheritance must be visible in the control plan so that a local exception is not mistakenly interpreted as the account standard.
Brand lists answer a business question: Should the campaign be associated only with interest in certain brands, or should association with selected brands be prevented? They replace neither negative keywords nor a review of permissible advertising claims. Spelling variants, ambiguous company names and generic terms require sampling before a list can be considered sufficiently complete.
Locations of interest are used at ad group level and incorporate location or geographic intent into matching. This is not the same as the campaign's general geographic targeting. A user must still satisfy the campaign's geographic criteria and also match the ad group's location of interest. A location excluded at campaign level cannot be used as a location of interest. If the search query names a location, that location takes priority; otherwise, the user's location of presence is considered. A service with a limited operating area therefore documents separately: the physically permitted region, locations of interest, excluded areas, the landing-page claim and the actual ability to deliver the service.
Brand exclusions and overarching brand inclusions with a clear rationale.
Different brand inclusions and locations of interest for a specific task.
Page content, availability and geographic claims must fit the control.
Review search terms, locations, landing pages and lead quality together rather than in isolation.
Activate AI Max in an existing Search campaign step by step and reproducibly
Start at campaign level, continue at ad group level and then document the account state actually visible
The current instructions for setting up AI Max for Search campaigns direct users of existing campaigns through Settings and the AI Max section. The main areas become visible after opting in. Search term matching is enabled campaign-wide and then controlled for each ad group; text customization and final URL expansion operate at campaign level. New Search campaigns may already show AI Max selected by default, so the setup review is also necessary for newly created campaigns.
In practice, do not activate everything first and investigate later what happened. Export the baseline, approve the control plan, confirm the goal, activate only the planned combination and then review every visible switch again. Open URL and brand controls at their actual level. Finally, save a configuration log with the date, account, campaign, ad groups, feature states and responsible person.
Bulk editing makes sense only after the pilot configuration is stable and the selected campaigns genuinely share the same business logic. Changing several campaigns together merely because their names are similar can overwrite different goals, page families or brand rules. Scalable setup comes from a reusable control plan, not from selecting as many campaigns as possible in the edit dialog.
- Export the baseline, goal, budget status and active legacy features.
- Activate AI Max at campaign level and select the planned asset features.
- Turn search term matching on or off for each ad group according to its role.
- Enter and save URL, brand and location controls at the correct level.
- After saving, reconcile the account state, control plan, review date and stop rule.
Test AI Max with a predefined hypothesis and a suitable control state
The experiment answers a limited question about impact, not a blanket question for or against AI
Google describes a dedicated workflow for AI Max experiments. Within an AI Max experiment, control and treatment shares run in the same campaign. The treatment arm uses the selected search term matching and asset optimization settings. However, brand inclusions or exclusions added during experiment setup apply to both arms for the duration of the experiment. Ad group-level changes, such as disabling search term matching or adding URL inclusions, are not configured during the initial setup step and can only be applied afterwards. Custom experiments with separate campaigns remain an alternative. Before setup, review limitations such as the Display Network, portfolio strategies, shared budgets, Bidding Exploration, active experiments or legacy features that are already enabled.
The hypothesis names the feature, affected demand, primary business signal, quality boundary and decision. Example: Additional search term matching should reach qualified enquiries outside the existing keyword coverage without exceeding the defined share of irrelevant enquiries or unsuitable landing pages. This is a testable direction, not a promise of a particular uplift.
Keep the goal definition, budget logic, offer scope and tracking as stable as possible during the experiment. Record seasonality, promotions, website changes, outages and changes to the sales process in the event log. Genuine brand, URL or measurement errors may be stopped immediately; a statistical test is not a reason to allow avoidable harm to continue.
| Hypothesis | Control state | Test feature | Primary signal | Quality boundary | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reach new relevant demand | Existing matching | Search term matching | Qualified conversion or value | Irrelevant terms and cost | Adopt, constrain or stop |
| Tailor the message more precisely | Approved RSA assets | Text customization with guidelines | Goal-related performance | Claim and brand errors | Approve or remove assets |
| Select more suitable pages | Fixed final URL | Expansion with exclusions | Conversion and page quality | Incorrect URLs and paths | Open or close the URL scope |
| Signal better lead quality | Existing primary goal | Stable, confirmed CRM status | Qualified lead or sale | Import and assignment errors | Use or repair the signal |
Read the search term, source, headline, landing page, conversion and business value separately
AI Max reporting improves transparency but does not replace professional quality assessment
Google's help page on reporting in AI Max for Search campaigns covers search terms, keywords, assets and landing pages. The AI Max match type and Source column help categorize additional matches. A combined view can show search terms, headlines and landing pages; in the landing page report, the 'Selected by' column identifies automatically selected destinations.
A filter for AI Max may show less volume because the 'Other search terms' category is not included in full. Do not construct an apparently exact total from a filtered report. Google also recommends allowing an initial learning period after activation before making routine optimization changes. This recommendation does not override a predefined stop rule for incorrect URLs, impermissible copy or measurement errors.
The control plan connects four levels: technical activation, observed delivery, correctly measured conversion and business value confirmed outside the platform. Only a suitable experiment supports a cautious assessment of impact. A better overall trend without a stable comparison shows a change over time, but not automatically its cause.
Search term, match type, source and affected ad group.
Actual headline, asset status and landing page served.
Conversion action, value, lag, deduplication and attribution.
Qualified lead, sale, margin or another confirmed outcome status.
Do not allow DSA, text customization and campaign-level broad match to move into AI Max unnoticed
Transition dates call for an inventory and review, not an unchecked full activation
In June 2026, Google updated the timeline for moving existing Search features to AI Max. The automatic DSA transition is scheduled to begin in February 2027. For text customization—previously automatically created assets—and the campaign-level broad match setting, automatic upgrades beginning in September 2026 remain relevant. Account notifications and the actual feature state should also be checked.
During a DSA upgrade, dynamic ad groups may be converted into standard ad groups and ads into responsive search ads. Existing URL rules and unsupported targets require particular attention; older rule types may become read-only. Therefore document the baseline export, existing dynamic targets, page feeds, URL rules, ad status and subsequent account presentation separately.
A migration is not a neutral name change, but neither is it evidence of a performance change. After the transition, review which features are actually active, which legacy settings were mirrored and whether ads, pages and measurement operate reliably. Questions about impact still require a suitable comparison; the migration date alone is not enough.
- Inventory campaigns using DSA, text customization and campaign-level broad match.
- Review the account notification, current help document and actual settings together.
- Export dynamic targets, page feeds, URL rules, RSA assets and reports.
- After the transition, document active features and read-only legacy rules.
- Do not causally confuse migration effects, seasonality, demand and other changes.
Approve the configuration with live sampling, known reporting paths and clear stop rules
A saved switch is operational only after technical and professional review
Approval begins with a four-eyes comparison between the control plan and the account. Review the campaign, ad groups, active features, inheritance, URL inclusions and exclusions, brand lists, locations of interest, text guidelines, conversion goal and bidding strategy. Then perform a live sample of permitted and prohibited pages, including tracking parameters, redirects and the conversion path.
A reporting path is known for every feature before the test starts. The team knows where additional search terms, Google-optimized assets, automatically selected landing pages and experiment data will appear. Schedule the first professional review without inventing a universal performance deadline. Immediate checks for URL, brand, policy and tracking errors remain separate from that schedule.
Stop rules include technical and business signals: 404 errors, the wrong language, an impermissible claim, a service not offered, an unresolved brand context, a sudden measurement discrepancy or missing CRM feedback. After a stop, the cause, correction and renewed approval remain open in the control plan. Merely turning off the switch does not count as a completed diagnosis.
| Review | Evidence | Blocker | Immediate response | Reapproval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feature state | Account matches the control plan | Unplanned activation | Stop the affected feature | State documented again |
| Search terms | Intent sample and source | Pattern of irrelevant terms | Constrain or exclude the group | Quality reviewed again |
| Ad copy | Assets served have been reviewed | Incorrect claim or tone | Remove the asset and correct the source | Professional approval |
| Landing pages | Live URLs and tracking tested | 404, wrong language or offer | Exclude the URL or stop FUE | Path technically confirmed |
| Measurement | Conversion and CRM reconciliation | Duplicate count or missing status | Repair the optimization signal | Data and purpose confirmed |
Frequently asked questions about setting up AI Max for Search campaigns
Short answers with specific levels and defensible boundaries
These answers reflect the documented status on 21 August 2026. Google may change labels, default settings, migration dates and controls. Before every implementation, the current official help documentation and the visible state in your own account take precedence.
Is AI Max a new campaign type?
No. AI Max is an optimization layer for existing Search campaigns. Search term matching, text customization and final URL expansion operate at different levels and should be approved separately in the control plan.
Does activation automatically turn on every feature?
Core features may be selected by default when you opt in. Text customization and final URL expansion can be controlled individually at campaign level; search term matching is also managed for each ad group. Review the account state actually visible after saving.
Does AI Max replace my keywords and negative keywords?
No. Additional matches supplement existing keywords with further signals. Keywords, negative keywords, brand controls, ad group structure and search term reporting retain distinct roles. Demonstrated relevance to the campaign's role is what matters.
Can I permit only certain landing pages?
URL inclusions operate at ad group level. Whether they genuinely constrain the usable scope also depends on the state of final URL expansion. If expansion is active at the same time, other relevant URLs on the domain may be used; the combination must be explicitly documented.
Will pinned RSA headlines always serve?
No. If a dynamically more relevant URL is selected, pinned RSA assets may not be respected. If a statement must always appear, assess whether final URL expansion and URL inclusions are compatible with that requirement.
Do text guidelines guarantee on-brand ads?
No. The feature is described as an experimental beta and supports term exclusions and messaging restrictions. It replaces neither current source content nor a review of the Google-optimized assets that actually served.
Should I activate AI Max in every Search campaign immediately?
Not without shared suitability. Begin with a clearly bounded campaign, a stable goal, suitable pages and reliable measurement. Bulk changes make sense only when the business role, controls and reports are genuinely comparable.
How can I prove that AI Max caused an improvement?
The strongest approach is a predefined experiment with a suitable control state, stable goals and documented confounding factors. A before-and-after trend or more conversions in the overall report alone does not establish causation and says little about business value without a quality review.
Turn AI Max into a controllable Search campaign configuration rather than a blanket AI switch
A robust setup connects three areas of automation: additional search terms, adaptable advertising messages and dynamic landing pages. In the AI Max control plan, each area receives a purpose, technical level, approved inputs, clear boundaries, a report and a responsible decision. This keeps the Search campaign professionally controllable even as automation increases.
The workflow is deliberately sequential: confirm the business goal and baseline, review the website and claims, create the control plan, configure features at the correct level, test URL and brand rules, start the experiment, read reports along the evidence chain and only then expand. Migrations and product changes are documented but are not automatically interpreted as impact.
AI Max can open additional opportunities, but activation is neither delivery nor success. What matters is whether relevant demand meets an appropriate message and an approved page, is measured correctly and produces confirmed business value outside the platform. That connection is what turns a feature into a responsible operating process.
Would you like to review AI Max, conversion goals, search terms and landing pages in your Google Ads account systematically? develop AI Max and Search campaigns with Salestudia under controlled conditions.